60-second learning curve
Open, tap mic, speak.
Simple by design
A Simple Productivity App That Doesn't Become a Second Job
Productivity apps tend to grow until managing them takes longer than doing the work. Lunelo stays small on purpose.
The problem
Most "simple" productivity apps grow. Todoist started as a list. TickTick started as a list. Notion started as a doc. By their third year, each one had projects, filters, integrations, automation rules, an AI assistant, and a forty-page onboarding flow with tooltips that point at things you didn't ask to learn. The original promise — "just a simple list" — gets buried under feature roadmaps written by product teams who need to justify enterprise pricing.
The user pays for that drift twice. Once for the app itself, in dollars per month. Again with hours spent learning new screens, configuring views, migrating between tools when the one they trusted got too heavy, and re-explaining the system to themselves every time they come back to it after a break. The cumulative tax — measured in setup time, decision fatigue, and abandoned subscriptions — usually dwarfs whatever the app cost.
How Lunelo solves it
Lunelo's strategy is to refuse growth in the wrong dimensions. The product won't get projects, filters, automation rules, integration marketplaces, or workflow templates — not because they're bad ideas in the abstract, but because they're someone else's product. Every feature you remove is a feature you don't have to design around for the next five years; every category you stay out of is a category you don't have to win.
What Lunelo does add over time: better AI parsing of messier sentences, more useful weekly insights, gentler interaction details, accessibility improvements, native platform integrations that make capture faster. The shape of the app stays the same — one screen for today, voice-first capture, AI structuring of the speech into a real task. We expect the screenshots in 2028 to look recognizable next to the screenshots in 2026.
The practical result is an app you can learn in sixty seconds. You open it, tap the mic, say what you need to do. There's no second tutorial that surfaces a week later. There's no advanced section hidden behind a settings page. There's nothing to migrate from when you switch devices. The simplicity isn't a phase — it's the structural commitment underneath everything else.
Features built around this
No projects, tags, integrations
What's in scope: tasks with priority and a date.
AI parsing handles structure
You talk in plain language; the model handles the rest.
Settings under 20 options
Mostly accessibility toggles.
Free with no usage cap
Premium adds analytics, not core features.
Compared to other tools
Things 3 is the simplicity reference point for iOS planners, and Lunelo sits in the same lineage — same instinct that what an app refuses to do is as important as what it does. The differences are deliberate: Things assumes you'll type, while Lunelo assumes you'll speak; Things has projects and areas as its organizing hierarchy, while Lunelo has only tasks and a day; Things is a one-time purchase with no AI parsing, while Lunelo's AI is exactly what makes voice-first capture actually usable rather than a gimmick.
Related: Minimalist planner app · Calm productivity app · Full comparison →
Frequently asked
How does Lunelo stay simple as it adds features?
It says no a lot. Features that would compound complexity (projects, sub-projects, filters, integrations) are out of scope, on purpose.
Will I miss the features other apps have?
If you're a project manager coordinating five people, yes — use a project manager's tool. If you're one person trying to get through today, probably not.
Does Lunelo sync to Google Calendar?
Not in v1. Calendar integration is an obvious request, but our concern is that it pulls Lunelo into being a calendar app instead of a planner. Considered for v1.x.
Is "simple" hiding a paywall?
No. The simplicity is the product. Free tier is fully usable forever.
Learn it in 60 seconds
Free to start. No account. No tracking SDKs.